Mengenal Satuan utk Didot Points

Desain Grafis - kali ini akan membahas tentang pentingnya fungsi ruler (penggaris) dan Guide Lines. Kok bisa? ya karena ketepatan dalam mendesain suatu layout sangat penting (terutama bagi yg bergerak di bidang setting) dan hal ini ditentukan oleh sama tidaknya panjang disain di corel (maya) dgn hasil sebenarnya (nyata). Misal kita ingin mendesain kartu nama maka ukuran kartu nama yg kita buat misalnya 9cm x 5,25 cm maka kita juga harus membuat ukuran layout yg sama di coreldraw. Dan utk itulah fitur ruler ini diperlukan. ok mari kita belajar corel lebih jauh

Desainer butuh penggaris? Tentu saja

Karena utk urusan main layout dan setting ketepatan posisi dan ukuran sangatlah penting. Berikut desktripsi singkat dari Ruler dan Guide Lines:

Ruler adalah bantuan berfungsi fungsi penggaris utk mengukur suatu obyek secara pasti dan tepat dgn presisi tinggi, ruler disediakan dalam posisi vertikal dan horisontal

Guide Lines dalam desain grafis berfungsi mengatur tata letak obyek dan ukuran-ukurannya pada saat memanipulasi obyek biasanya disimbolkan dalam koordinat x: dan y:

Unit / Satuan Ukuran Pada Coreldraw ada Centimeter, Milimeter, Inchi, dll

Satuan Jarak (Panjang)

· 1 centimeter (cm) = 100 millimeters (mm) --- paling sering dipakai utk jasa setting

· 1 inches (inci) = 2.54 centimeters (inchi biasanya digunakan utk mengukur panjang secara diagonal)

· 1 mile = 1760 yard

· 1 yard = 3 feet = 914.4 millimeters (mm)

· 1 meter (m)= 100 Centimeters (cm)

· 1 kilometer (km) = 1000 meter (m)

· 1 mile = 1.609344 Kilometer (km)

Satuan utk Didot Points

· 1 Didot point = 0.376065 mm = 1.07007 pica = 0.0148057 inch

· 1 cicero = 12 didot points

Nah sekarang kita sudah mempunyai penggaris / bantuan pengukur, jadi ini gunanya bila suatu saat kita diminta mendesain foto dgn jarak 2 cm antara foto yg satu dgn yg lain maka kita tidak akan lagi kesulitan.

Dgn begini maka melayout / mensetting di Corel DRAW jadi lebih mudah bukan

Semoga bermanfaat

Sumber: ilmugrafis.com

Temukan Info Lain Seputar Desain Grafis

Trik Memutihkan Paha Atas

Pemutih Kulit - Utk daerah paha atas atau sekitar selangkangan, daerah ini memang memiliki warna yg cenderung lebih gelap dibandingkan daerah lainnya, karena area ini sangat tertutup dan hampir setiap kali bergesekan dgn sisi lainnya. Jadi, sekalipuan memakai krim pemutih kulit, bila daerah tersebut selalu terkena gesekan (termasuk karena gesekan celana denim yg terlalu ketat), kemungkinan semua perawatan yg dijalani tidak akan memberi hasil yg memuaskan.

Sebenarnya kulit yg berwarna gelap di daerah selangkangan ini perlahan-lahan dapat memutih bila seluruh tubuh Anda juga memutih. Ini bisa diperoleh dgn menjalani perawatan utk mencerahkan kulit. Selain itu Anda juga bisa memakai krim pemutih kulit khusus utk daerah tersebut. Namun, cara ini memerlukan ketekunan dan kesabaran yg tinggi karena memerlukan proses agak lama.

Perlu diketahui juga, warna hitam pada selangkangan bisa dihilangkan jika hanya mengenai kulit permukaan. Jika telah mencapai bagian dalam kulit, mungkin diperlukan operasi utk menghilangkannya.

Sumber: kompas.com

Temukan Info Lain Seputar Pemutih Kulit

black underwear lauren budd - iphone 640 x 960

-----

Lauren Budd is an 18-year-old Australian swimsuit model.

black underwear lauren budd - ipad 1024 x 1024

-----

Lauren Budd is an 18-year-old Australian swimsuit model.

The NHS computer system

Back last year, I wrote a piece about totally crap software and how the government is totally incapable of specifying an IT system and is much less capable of delivering the project within budget and time scales, so it comes as no surprise to find that the latest multi-billion pound white elephant is to be subjected to yet another review.

One of the major problems with commissioning work from third party contractors is that there is no incentive to deliver the system. Every time the spec changes - which happens with government work continually - the price changes and, of course, if it doesn't work properly after delivery then there is the endless debate about what is and isn't chargeable. I liken it to driving your shiny new BMW off the forecourt only to find it breaks down 50 yards up the road and then being told you will be charged to fix it because it wasn't being driven properly.

The National Audit Office started to suspect this thing wasn't going to fly as long ago as August 2004 as you can see from their typically understated concerns here on the BBC website. In February 2007, the Daily Telegraph decided that it was doomed to failure and quoted senior sources at Fujitsu - one of the major suppliers - as voicing concern at the direction of the NHS programme and the lack of vision on how the health service can make best use of new technology.

"What we are trying to do is run an enormous programme with the techniques that we are absolutely familiar with for running small projects. And it isn't working. And it isn't going to work," he told his audience.

As with all things of this nature, there comes a time when the contractor and the government aren't going to agree and,as, usual, the government is going to blame the people who actually know what they are talking about so in May 2008, Fujitsu were fired. At this stage the project was already four years behind schedule.
So far the costs had escalated from £6.7 billion to £12 billion with worse news still to come when in January 2009, the Guardian reported that the system was on brink of failure, something which should cone as no surprise as some people had been on record as saying this for years. However, the issue refused to lay quietly around and die as hundreds of junior doctors were having their job applications screwed up!
 
So here we are in 2011, and the costs are now estimated at £20 billion and, according to the BBC, "things are getting worse"

The response? Well, the government announced there will be a review of the project. This is due to start this week.

Tory MP Richard Bacon, a member of the House of Commons' Public Accounts Committee and long-standing critic of the plans, said: "It is perfectly clear that throwing more money at the problem will not work. This turkey will never fly and it is time the Department of Health faced reality and channelled the remaining funds into something useful that will actually benefit patients. The largest civilian IT project in the world has failed."

But the Department of Health said while the original vision "was flawed", the project still had the potential to deliver value for money.

Yeah, right...

The NHS computer system

Back last year, I wrote a piece about totally crap software and how the government is totally incapable of specifying an IT system and is much less capable of delivering the project within budget and time scales, so it comes as no surprise to find that the latest multi-billion pound white elephant is to be subjected to yet another review.

One of the major problems with commissioning work from third party contractors is that there is no incentive to deliver the system. Every time the spec changes - which happens with government work continually - the price changes and, of course, if it doesn't work properly after delivery then there is the endless debate about what is and isn't chargeable. I liken it to driving your shiny new BMW off the forecourt only to find it breaks down 50 yards up the road and then being told you will be charged to fix it because it wasn't being driven properly.

The National Audit Office started to suspect this thing wasn't going to fly as long ago as August 2004 as you can see from their typically understated concerns here on the BBC website. In February 2007, the Daily Telegraph decided that it was doomed to failure and quoted senior sources at Fujitsu - one of the major suppliers - as voicing concern at the direction of the NHS programme and the lack of vision on how the health service can make best use of new technology.

"What we are trying to do is run an enormous programme with the techniques that we are absolutely familiar with for running small projects. And it isn't working. And it isn't going to work," he told his audience.

As with all things of this nature, there comes a time when the contractor and the government aren't going to agree and,as, usual, the government is going to blame the people who actually know what they are talking about so in May 2008, Fujitsu were fired. At this stage the project was already four years behind schedule.
So far the costs had escalated from £6.7 billion to £12 billion with worse news still to come when in January 2009, the Guardian reported that the system was on brink of failure, something which should cone as no surprise as some people had been on record as saying this for years. However, the issue refused to lay quietly around and die as hundreds of junior doctors were having their job applications screwed up!
 
So here we are in 2011, and the costs are now estimated at £20 billion and, according to the BBC, "things are getting worse"

The response? Well, the government announced there will be a review of the project. This is due to start this week.

Tory MP Richard Bacon, a member of the House of Commons' Public Accounts Committee and long-standing critic of the plans, said: "It is perfectly clear that throwing more money at the problem will not work. This turkey will never fly and it is time the Department of Health faced reality and channelled the remaining funds into something useful that will actually benefit patients. The largest civilian IT project in the world has failed."

But the Department of Health said while the original vision "was flawed", the project still had the potential to deliver value for money.

Yeah, right...

black underwear lauren budd - 1920 x 1200

-----

Lauren Budd is an 18-year-old Australian swimsuit model.